Market Loss Assistance Program in Ellis County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 891
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Ellis County, Oklahoma totaled $6,318,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jones Family Farm | Gage, OK 73843 | $23,272 |
82 | Donald Bay | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $22,810 |
83 | Gary K Smith | Arnett, OK 73832 | $22,688 |
84 | Gary-gary Bayless & Glenn Bayless | Arnett, OK 73832 | $22,679 |
85 | Rex Shafer | Beaver, OK 73932 | $22,411 |
86 | Wayne L Mackey | Gage, OK 73843 | $22,192 |
87 | Earl Dean Wayland | Arnett, OK 73832 | $22,079 |
88 | Russell Tune | Fargo, OK 73840 | $21,839 |
89 | Kent D Miller | Gage, OK 73843 | $21,631 |
90 | Clifford-clifford & Schwab | Higgins, TX 79046 | $21,627 |
91 | Earl Schoenhals Living Trust | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $21,588 |
92 | Ted Harvey | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $21,223 |
93 | Mark Bay | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $21,038 |
94 | Norman Bay | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $21,038 |
95 | Donald Ray Jenkins | Gage, OK 73843 | $20,946 |
96 | Colmer Joe Mccollough | Florissant, CO 80816 | $20,903 |
97 | J R Clayton Depriest | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $20,692 |
98 | Grayson Kelln | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $20,445 |
99 | L V Hanan | Arnett, OK 73832 | $20,234 |
100 | Bayless Farms | Arnett, OK 73832 | $19,706 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”