Direct Payment Program in Ellis County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,182
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Ellis County, Oklahoma totaled $14,510,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Flakey Wilson | Arnett, OK 73832 | $34,808 |
122 | Deryl Parker | Arnett, OK 73832 | $34,637 |
123 | Larry Thornton | Woodward, OK 73801 | $34,102 |
124 | Leo Schickedanz | Gage, OK 73843 | $33,917 |
125 | Scott-scott And Nanc Vincent | Arnett, OK 73832 | $33,840 |
126 | Jim Cadwell | Arnett, OK 73832 | $33,802 |
127 | William R Tune Jr | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $33,549 |
128 | Sherlyn Longhofer | Gage, OK 73843 | $33,392 |
129 | Benbrook Farms L L C | Woodward, OK 73802 | $33,083 |
130 | Larry Abbey | Woodward, OK 73802 | $32,960 |
131 | Robert W Thomas | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $32,603 |
132 | Ronald M Wayland Family Trust | Arnett, OK 73832 | $32,557 |
133 | Whites Land And Cattle LLC | Gage, OK 73843 | $32,390 |
134 | Don Shepherd | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $32,102 |
135 | Norman Bay | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $32,036 |
136 | Randy Knowles | Arnett, OK 73832 | $31,670 |
137 | Joy Wilson Rev Trust | Arnett, OK 73832 | $31,316 |
138 | Clifford Leroy Deal | May, OK 73851 | $31,072 |
139 | Edwin Smith | Arnett, OK 73832 | $30,822 |
140 | Dale Wanger Land & Cattle Company | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $30,601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”