Farm Subsidy information
Garfield County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Garfield County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,004
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Garfield County, Oklahoma totaled $468,796,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steinert Farm Oper Partnership | Covington, OK 73730 | $4,397,514 |
2 | Reinschmiedt Fam Gen Prtnrship | Garber, OK 73738 | $4,197,905 |
3 | Gerald D Brakhage | Lahoma, OK 73754 | $3,526,133 |
4 | Bank Of Kremlin | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $2,509,518 |
5 | Ted Robert Mack | Enid, OK 73703 | $2,197,783 |
6 | Diel & Diel Inc | Enid, OK 73701 | $2,148,767 |
7 | Eddie Zaloudek & Sons Inc | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $2,131,995 |
8 | Ronald E Regier | Enid, OK 73701 | $1,916,829 |
9 | Kevin D Johnson | Enid, OK 73701 | $1,796,159 |
10 | Nick Kramer III | Douglas, OK 73733 | $1,774,962 |
11 | Lynn R Kroll | Fairmont, OK 73736 | $1,694,140 |
12 | James R Kokojan II Rev Tst | Enid, OK 73703 | $1,637,713 |
13 | Troy Loesch | Douglas, OK 73733 | $1,580,298 |
14 | Robert Dale Gray Farms Inc | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $1,579,818 |
15 | Ken Bolenbaugh | Carrier, OK 73727 | $1,544,601 |
16 | Larry Johnson | Hunter, OK 74640 | $1,459,302 |
17 | E & W Farms | Waukomis, OK 73773 | $1,445,845 |
18 | Rodney Wayne Timm | Enid, OK 73701 | $1,438,650 |
19 | Kristina A Cassody | Covington, OK 73730 | $1,411,490 |
20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,403,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>