Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Garfield County, Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,250
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Garfield County, Oklahoma totaled $19,420,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bank Of Kremlin | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $1,406,756 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $643,228 |
3 | Farm Credit Of Enid ** | Enid, OK 73703 | $523,406 |
4 | Reinschmiedt Fam Gen Prtnrship | Garber, OK 73738 | $490,849 |
5 | First Bank & Trust ** | Perry, OK 73077 | $318,745 |
6 | Steinert Farm Oper Partnership | Fairmont, OK 73736 | $256,508 |
7 | Messenger Farms Inc | Enid, OK 73703 | $249,506 |
8 | James R Kokojan II Rev Tst | Enid, OK 73703 | $246,175 |
9 | Matt Kokojan | Waukomis, OK 73773 | $240,999 |
10 | Rick Kokojan | Bison, OK 73720 | $229,350 |
11 | First National Bank Of Oklahoma ** | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $226,143 |
12 | Gerald D Brakhage | Lahoma, OK 73754 | $196,907 |
13 | R & R Gray Equipment & Cattle LLC | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $190,623 |
14 | Larry Johnson | Hunter, OK 74640 | $178,817 |
15 | David D Buss | Hunter, OK 74640 | $177,985 |
16 | James P Hane | Waukomis, OK 73773 | $173,466 |
17 | Albert A Beebe | Enid, OK 73703 | $160,385 |
18 | Greg N Vencl | Garber, OK 73738 | $147,543 |
19 | Karen Eifert Jones | Waukomis, OK 73773 | $146,935 |
20 | Oklahoma Ag Credit ** | Watonga, OK 73772 | $141,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>