Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Grady County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 759

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Grady County, Oklahoma totaled $9,326,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Stockman Oklahoma Inc.Apache, OK 73006$233,583
2Turner Farms LLCAmber, OK 73004$200,080
3Tim OsbornTuttle, OK 73089$143,273
4George W Thomas IIIChickasha, OK 73023$137,492
5Cs Farm & Cattle LLCOklahoma City, OK 73170$133,916
6Mclemore Farms Land & Cattle LLCBradley, OK 73011$124,893
7White Brothers Cattle CoChickasha, OK 73023$119,566
8Melford L Scott And Margaret L Scott Revocable TruCement, OK 73017$118,139
9Bryan Shane CastorNinnekah, OK 73067$111,493
10Curtis J Straka-the Curtis & Terri Straka Living TOklahoma City, OK 73170$101,829
11Mr Stephen- Stephen Wade Standridge Rev TrChickasha, OK 73018$97,518
12Brent Anthony PittmanRush Springs, OK 73082$94,622
13Roy L SparksChickasha, OK 73018$90,985
14Hillside Dairy LLCChickasha, OK 73018$86,204
15Toby Farms LLCOklahoma City, OK 73179$85,169
16Will OsbornTuttle, OK 73089$76,990
17Bruce Savage-bruce Savage Revocable TrustPocasset, OK 73079$75,312
18Grady Co., Inc.Chickasha, OK 73018$75,206
19Rocking B Cattle LLCChickasha, OK 73018$73,044
20Will WheelerChickasha, OK 73018$72,218

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag