Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Grant County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 181
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Grant County, Oklahoma totaled $482,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Antelope Living Tr | Denton, TX 76209 | $2,310 |
62 | Della Raye Dowell Revoc Trust | Hunter, OK 74640 | $2,306 |
63 | Amos Smith | Deer Creek, OK 74636 | $2,276 |
64 | Merle Wesley Ascue | Lamont, OK 74643 | $2,231 |
65 | Don Wilson | Hunter, OK 74640 | $2,221 |
66 | Roger S Diller | Nash, OK 73761 | $2,204 |
67 | Rempel Farms Inc | Medford, OK 73759 | $2,173 |
68 | Arlis E Rogers | Pratt, KS 67124 | $2,141 |
69 | Lois Powell | Medford, OK 73759 | $2,133 |
70 | Reed Bramlett | Medford, OK 73759 | $2,123 |
71 | Virginia M Spencer | Avon Lake, OH 44012 | $2,114 |
72 | H W Williamson | Medford, OK 73759 | $2,108 |
73 | Danny Halcomb | Pond Creek, OK 73766 | $2,063 |
74 | Kenneth M Seaton | Pigeon Forge, TN 37868 | $2,032 |
75 | Virgil Shoffner Irr Tst | Enid, OK 73701 | $2,025 |
76 | Jeanette Andriano | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $1,950 |
77 | Pat Dowell | Lamont, OK 74643 | $1,950 |
78 | Gerald L & Sylvia S Hartman Living Trust | Conway Springs, KS 67031 | $1,936 |
79 | George Diller | Nash, OK 73761 | $1,923 |
80 | Evelyn B Fell | Caldwell, KS 67022 | $1,918 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”