Cotton Ginning Program in Harmon County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 111
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Harmon County, Oklahoma totaled $1,166,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Earl Pickerill | Dodson, TX 79230 | $5,351 |
42 | David R Jones | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,237 |
43 | Darin Mitch Brookman | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,160 |
44 | Jeanette Susan Brookman | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,160 |
45 | Joe M Shelby | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,146 |
46 | Robinson & Sons LLC | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,938 |
47 | Jeffrey Scott Dill | Hollis, OK 73550 | $4,751 |
48 | Mike S Cary | Hollis, OK 73550 | $4,501 |
49 | Bobby Royal White Irr Trust | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,395 |
50 | Lou Ann White Rev Trust | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,393 |
51 | Randy & Donna Mefford-jv | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,382 |
52 | Donald Alden Craddock | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,416 |
53 | Mclaughlin Housing Inc | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,352 |
54 | Mary Beth Williams Revoc Living Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,322 |
55 | D Daren Jones | Vinson, OK 73571 | $2,928 |
56 | Judith Messenger | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $2,737 |
57 | Moore Land & Cattle Co | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,505 |
58 | Hunter M'kay Dennis | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,341 |
59 | Bill Estes | Wellington, TX 79095 | $2,230 |
60 | Kenneth Bartlett Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,202 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”