Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Harmon County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 168
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Harmon County, Oklahoma totaled $1,629,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jared Rhet Johnson | Duke, OK 73532 | $6,190 |
62 | Rose Mary Heatly | Mangum, OK 73554 | $6,095 |
63 | Joy Faulks | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,870 |
64 | Bobby Royal White Irr Trust | Gould, OK 73544 | $5,708 |
65 | Lou Ann White Rev Trust | Gould, OK 73544 | $5,704 |
66 | Inca Land & Cattle LLC | Eldorado, OK 73537 | $5,684 |
67 | Zachrey Wayne Adams | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,279 |
68 | Lee Roy Crawford & Melba Crawford | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,269 |
69 | Scotty Brandon Smith | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,021 |
70 | Doris F Bogart | Mangum, OK 73554 | $4,951 |
71 | Jared Motley | Hollis, OK 73550 | $4,897 |
72 | Edward & Alma Emerson Heritage Trust-irr | Lubbock, TX 79453 | $4,744 |
73 | Ballard Hill Trust-irr | Lake Forest, CA 92630 | $4,344 |
74 | Vinson Farms-a Limited Partnershi | Bethany, OK 73008 | $4,165 |
75 | Talmadge Davidson | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,070 |
76 | Gayland Miranda | Altus, OK 73521 | $3,864 |
77 | Greg Strawn | Eldorado, OK 73537 | $3,807 |
78 | John E Richeson | Harrah, OK 73045 | $3,780 |
79 | Donald Alden Craddock | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,447 |
80 | Garland E Jones | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,305 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”