Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Harmon County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 168
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Harmon County, Oklahoma totaled $1,629,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Keevin Jones | Colony, OK 73021 | $1,295 |
122 | Jeffrey Scott Dill | Hollis, OK 73550 | $1,290 |
123 | Sharon D'ann Williams | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,274 |
124 | Robert R Cansler | Gould, OK 73544 | $1,233 |
125 | Mae Ola Stewart | Goodwell, OK 73939 | $1,184 |
126 | Patterson-young Farm Partnership | El Paso, TX 79907 | $1,171 |
127 | Peggy Allison | Hollis, OK 73550 | $1,138 |
128 | Apache Industries Inc | Childress, TX 79201 | $952 |
129 | Norman Coomes | Plainfield, IN 46168 | $915 |
130 | Gail J Archer | Memphis, TX 79245 | $888 |
131 | Billie Hill | Thomas, OK 73669 | $880 |
132 | Sharon Boyett Hensley | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $846 |
133 | Emalee King | Drumright, OK 74030 | $819 |
134 | Bruce D Fried | Lubbock, TX 79407 | $808 |
135 | Ricky Mefford | Madill, OK 73446 | $790 |
136 | Vicki Godal | Hays, KS 67601 | $773 |
137 | Davidson 2009 Limited Partnership | Gould, OK 73544 | $754 |
138 | Joyce Wright | Hollis, OK 73550 | $729 |
139 | Mildred Edmonson | Oklahoma City, OK 73120 | $643 |
140 | Teddie Brookman | Altus, OK 73521 | $630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”