Farm Subsidy information
Harmon County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Harmon County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,948
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harmon County, Oklahoma totaled $318,627,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beanland Farms | Hollis, OK 73550 | $7,710,320 |
2 | K & S Partnership | Hollis, OK 73550 | $6,147,098 |
3 | Bill & Karen Dill-joint Venture | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,690,428 |
4 | Williams Farms Of Gould LLC | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,776,868 |
5 | Thomas & Karen Coomes-jv | Hollis, OK 73550 | $4,472,088 |
6 | David Smith | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,280,230 |
7 | Frankie Long | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,058,021 |
8 | Paul Horton Farms Inc | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,565,407 |
9 | Robert Paul Whorton | Gould, OK 73544 | $2,552,733 |
10 | Stockmans Bank ** | Gould, OK 73544 | $2,513,927 |
11 | Kendall L Williams | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,378,965 |
12 | G Kevin Crockett | Gould, OK 73544 | $2,314,774 |
13 | Billy G Searcey | Gould, OK 73544 | $2,237,242 |
14 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,202,166 |
15 | Garlon Ray Riley | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,156,231 |
16 | James Motley Revoc Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,155,683 |
17 | Kerald R Searcey | Gould, OK 73544 | $2,104,333 |
18 | Gallagher Land & Cattle Co LLC | Altus, OK 73521 | $2,056,605 |
19 | Tommy J Mcdonald | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,038,346 |
20 | Garrison Family Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $1,995,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>