Conservation Reserve Program in Harmon County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 804
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Harmon County, Oklahoma totaled $34,901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bill & Karen Dill-joint Venture | Hollis, OK 73550 | $914,509 |
2 | Rosemarie Motley | Norman, OK 73071 | $877,395 |
3 | Williams Farms Of Gould LLC | Gould, OK 73544 | $868,470 |
4 | James Motley Revoc Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $710,207 |
5 | Sugar Farms Inc | Granbury, TX 76049 | $657,454 |
6 | James & Jana Motley Jv | Hollis, OK 73550 | $637,496 |
7 | David R Whorton Revocable Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $566,445 |
8 | Arlis Motley Rev Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $556,944 |
9 | Garland E Jones | Hollis, OK 73550 | $524,437 |
10 | D J Shelby | Hollis, OK 73550 | $514,358 |
11 | Tommy J Mcdonald | Hollis, OK 73550 | $468,587 |
12 | Talmadge Davidson | Gould, OK 73544 | $434,919 |
13 | R W Dub Sherrill | Vinson, OK 73571 | $430,822 |
14 | Moore Land & Cattle Co | Hollis, OK 73550 | $392,364 |
15 | Ralph Mitchell Farms Inc | Mangum, OK 73554 | $392,220 |
16 | Jerry Robinson | Hollis, OK 73550 | $377,095 |
17 | Jo Ella Meek | Midland, TX 79705 | $353,736 |
18 | Alice M Motley Rev Trust | Hollis, OK 73550 | $320,537 |
19 | J O Heflin | Altus, OK 73521 | $306,075 |
20 | Lavon Kirby | Hollis, OK 73550 | $303,957 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>