Total Conservation Programs in Harper County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,200
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Harper County, Oklahoma totaled $55,636,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Adkins | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $264,327 |
42 | Donna Symes | Cheney, KS 67025 | $260,478 |
43 | Joan S Adams Revocable Trust | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $256,207 |
44 | Henry D Vloedman | Woodward, OK 73802 | $248,031 |
45 | Dovie Farmer | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $241,091 |
46 | C R Chuck Smith - Dba The Smith Ranch Living Trust | Woodward, OK 73801 | $241,013 |
47 | John Hatfield | Oxford, AR 72565 | $238,978 |
48 | Red Cliff Farms Of Ok | Ashland, KS 67831 | $231,400 |
49 | Don Painter Rev Trust | Woodward, OK 73802 | $223,146 |
50 | Betty Lively | Rosston, OK 73855 | $222,277 |
51 | Genevieve Owens | Kanab, UT 84741 | $220,505 |
52 | Luella Hardison | Gate, OK 73844 | $219,653 |
53 | Terry Carter Family Trust | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $213,167 |
54 | J C Love | Laverne, OK 73848 | $209,583 |
55 | Dorothy Sue Hoffman Gst Exemption Residuary Trust | Oklahoma City, OK 73124 | $208,582 |
56 | Lois Demuth | Yukon, OK 73099 | $208,154 |
57 | Kenney F Seeger | Woodward, OK 73802 | $207,691 |
58 | G Murl Thrasher | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $206,161 |
59 | Chester Shupe | Mesa, AZ 85201 | $204,900 |
60 | Rosa Lee Rogers | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $204,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”