Farm Subsidy information
Harper County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Harper County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 627
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harper County, Oklahoma totaled $7,996,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ms Natalie Monique Mcclung | May, OK 73851 | $17,151 |
102 | James R Shaffer | Rosston, OK 73855 | $16,758 |
103 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $16,752 |
104 | Archie Zinn | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $16,590 |
105 | Howard Terry Aitken | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $16,383 |
106 | Darrell Maphet | Rosston, OK 73855 | $15,833 |
107 | Gary Lee Hinther | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $15,757 |
108 | Kirby Wanger | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $15,676 |
109 | Rodney Lee Roetker | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $15,446 |
110 | Douglas Love | Laverne, OK 73848 | $15,386 |
111 | Jacqueline A Zimmerman Rev Trust | Georgetown, TX 78633 | $15,328 |
112 | Towanda Mallry | Alva, OK 73717 | $15,119 |
113 | Ira Don Roberts | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $14,980 |
114 | Francisco Mata | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $14,700 |
115 | Bonnie C Mckee | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $14,634 |
116 | Martin Zehner | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $14,566 |
117 | Joshua Love | Laverne, OK 73848 | $14,458 |
118 | Van Dorn Land & Cattle Company | Woodward, OK 73802 | $14,371 |
119 | Rusty Lynn Redfearn | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $14,057 |
120 | Fred Little | Rosston, OK 73855 | $13,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”