Farm Subsidy information
Harper County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Harper County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 523
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harper County, Oklahoma totaled $14,024,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Marietta F Weder Rev Trust | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $27,448 |
122 | Adam A Riggs | Laverne, OK 73848 | $27,422 |
123 | Howard Terry Aitken | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $27,162 |
124 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $26,767 |
125 | Sam Mosshart | Protection, KS 67127 | $26,394 |
126 | , | $25,958 | |
127 | Larry R Petty | Protection, KS 67127 | $24,878 |
128 | Mickey Bentley | Rosston, OK 73855 | $24,761 |
129 | Lotspeich Custom Application LLC | Rosston, OK 73855 | $24,441 |
130 | Snake Creek Ranch | Ashland, KS 67831 | $23,582 |
131 | Ralph Adcock- Ralph V & Carol J Adcock Rev Qualifi | Royal, AR 71968 | $23,313 |
132 | Andrew William Cunningham | Rosston, OK 73855 | $22,936 |
133 | Lazy 76 Ranch LLC | Laverne, OK 73848 | $22,876 |
134 | Kirk W Woodruff | Ashland, KS 67831 | $22,643 |
135 | Brad L Zollinger | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $22,633 |
136 | Justin Don Yauk | Woodward, OK 73801 | $22,544 |
137 | Bar O Land & Cattle LLC | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $22,350 |
138 | Don E Adams Revocable Trust | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $22,280 |
139 | Chance Husted | Laverne, OK 73848 | $22,048 |
140 | Dale Wanger | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $21,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”