Farm Subsidy information
Jackson County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Jackson County, Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 709
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jackson County, Oklahoma totaled $51,837,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stowe Farms Inc | Elmer, OK 73539 | $116,259 |
42 | Reid Lynn Warren | Duke, OK 73532 | $115,515 |
43 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Altus, OK 73521 | $114,942 |
44 | Pryor Farms Inc | Olustee, OK 73560 | $112,020 |
45 | Jerry Wayne Drury | Olustee, OK 73560 | $108,368 |
46 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $106,076 |
47 | Jimmie D Briscoe | Altus, OK 73521 | $105,589 |
48 | P Matthew Muller | Altus, OK 73521 | $105,036 |
49 | Mitchell D Worrell Revocable Trust | Altus, OK 73521 | $103,638 |
50 | Hour Glass Cattle Co. | Altus, OK 73521 | $100,859 |
51 | Clinton Farms LLC | Altus, OK 73521 | $100,179 |
52 | Bates Bros & Sons | Altus, OK 73521 | $99,726 |
53 | Bassel Farms LLC | Altus, OK 73521 | $99,687 |
54 | Harrison Land & Cattle Co Inc | Cisco, TX 76437 | $96,150 |
55 | , | $94,656 | |
56 | Jess Mark Nichols Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $91,801 |
57 | Raylon Shumaker | Eldorado, OK 73537 | $88,455 |
58 | Ed & Rob Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $86,467 |
59 | Jennie Buchanan | Altus, OK 73521 | $84,802 |
60 | Justin C & Amy L Abernathy Jt Vt | Altus, OK 73521 | $83,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”