Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Jefferson County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 83
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Jefferson County, Oklahoma totaled $767,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Parker Ranch LLC | Waurika, OK 73573 | $5,341 |
22 | Dustin Alan Weatherly | Ringling, OK 73456 | $5,267 |
23 | Brad Wade | Ringling, OK 73456 | $5,219 |
24 | David Morrison | Terral, OK 73569 | $5,158 |
25 | Russell Dale Weatherly | Terral, OK 73569 | $4,808 |
26 | Mike Weatherly | Terral, OK 73569 | $4,808 |
27 | Mike Petit | Waurika, OK 73573 | $4,413 |
28 | Johnny Ray Farris | Addington, OK 73520 | $4,166 |
29 | Todd Casebolt | Ryan, OK 73565 | $4,088 |
30 | Dangelmayr Ranch Partnership | Muenster, TX 76252 | $3,788 |
31 | Seay Brothers Ranch Inc | Ryan, OK 73565 | $3,712 |
32 | Claypool Ranch LLC | Ringling, OK 73456 | $3,580 |
33 | Angela Sue Wade | Ringling, OK 73456 | $3,559 |
34 | Roy B Bartling | Waurika, OK 73573 | $3,527 |
35 | Hbh Cattle Co | Waurika, OK 73573 | $3,353 |
36 | H Mike Lester | Ringling, OK 73456 | $3,274 |
37 | Lyndal Vanbuskirk | Ringling, OK 73456 | $3,201 |
38 | Dell Allen Farris | Comanche, OK 73529 | $3,184 |
39 | T3 Cattle LLC | Ringling, OK 73456 | $3,089 |
40 | James E Montgomery | Waurika, OK 73573 | $3,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”