Farm Subsidy information
Kay County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Kay County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,011
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kay County, Oklahoma totaled $390,784,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Linda Day Farms Inc | Braman, OK 74632 | $972,740 |
42 | John D Powelson | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $969,072 |
43 | Kahle Dennis E Rev Tr | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $967,554 |
44 | Dale Conrad Fath | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $965,776 |
45 | William Everman Rigdon | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $960,063 |
46 | Joe Caughlin | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $950,584 |
47 | J Neal Otto | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $944,576 |
48 | Schieber Farms LLC | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $933,611 |
49 | Grose William H Sr Rev Liv Tr | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $932,484 |
50 | Larry J Tripp | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $921,399 |
51 | Scott M Blubaugh | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $911,793 |
52 | Douglas E Merz | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $904,528 |
53 | Harlan Leroy Overman | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $901,697 |
54 | Steven D Wooderson | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $899,513 |
55 | Marscha C Kahle Rev Tr | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $897,984 |
56 | Allen E Taylor | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $894,161 |
57 | Beverly J Wooderson | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $891,985 |
58 | Cheryl Lindsey | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $883,619 |
59 | Martin E Mccorgary Revocable Trust | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $872,662 |
60 | Dewitt Acres LLC | Braman, OK 74632 | $868,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”