Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Kay County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 524
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Kay County, Oklahoma totaled $1,614,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Lance K Bergman | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $3,110 |
142 | Lawrence Horinek | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $3,108 |
143 | Leon W Wyckoff | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $3,069 |
144 | Betty J Throop | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $3,063 |
145 | James F Hinton | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $3,003 |
146 | Dt Farms | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $2,979 |
147 | W Dale Goodwin | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $2,963 |
148 | Robert D Voegele | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $2,923 |
149 | Donald R Wilkerson Liv Tr | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $2,903 |
150 | Stucky Farms Inc | South Haven, KS 67140 | $2,870 |
151 | Michael Ray Taylor | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $2,868 |
152 | Kenneth L Sheik | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $2,868 |
153 | Ray Alan Schieber | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $2,853 |
154 | Opal E Ray | Braman, OK 74632 | $2,839 |
155 | Shuart Farms | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $2,815 |
156 | Ray M Schiltz | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $2,729 |
157 | Ryan Vincent Kirkpatrick | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $2,694 |
158 | John H Merhoff | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $2,692 |
159 | Sherman Otto | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $2,686 |
160 | Arnetta Hudson | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $2,670 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”