Farm Subsidy information
Kay County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Kay County, Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,882
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kay County, Oklahoma totaled $350,901,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry Ivan Young | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $1,096,023 |
22 | Rick D Jeans | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $1,072,264 |
23 | Garry Davis | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $1,051,332 |
24 | Jc Fath | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $1,045,159 |
25 | James D Davis | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $1,034,835 |
26 | Derry L Lusk | Nardin, OK 74646 | $1,022,607 |
27 | Kevin Joe Rothgeb | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $1,015,128 |
28 | Mark Alan Liegerot | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $1,006,977 |
29 | Daniel Bowling Irrv Liv Tr | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $993,084 |
30 | R R Kahle Inc | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $988,634 |
31 | Day Farms Inc | Braman, OK 74632 | $984,690 |
32 | John B Olsen | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $982,111 |
33 | Linda Day Farms Inc | Braman, OK 74632 | $972,616 |
34 | David L Young-david L Young & Leslie A Young Rev T | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $969,975 |
35 | Kahle Dennis E Rev Tr | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $967,554 |
36 | Garold Dewitt | Braman, OK 74632 | $960,573 |
37 | William Everman Rigdon | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $960,063 |
38 | Jerry L Ramey | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $959,425 |
39 | Jeffrey Ballagh | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $934,412 |
40 | Grose William H Sr Rev Liv Tr | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $932,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”