Farm Subsidy information
Latimer County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Latimer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 755
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Latimer County, Oklahoma totaled $16,509,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Virginia Ann Alford | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $59,917 |
62 | Timothy W Kreutzer | Talihina, OK 74571 | $58,836 |
63 | John Mccabe | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $57,044 |
64 | , | $55,773 | |
65 | Kenny Fazekas | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $55,242 |
66 | Randall L Holmes | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $55,063 |
67 | Delbert Derryberry | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $54,520 |
68 | Dustin Wayne Brinkley | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $53,947 |
69 | Shawn D Curliss | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $52,728 |
70 | Clyde Spears | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $52,258 |
71 | John Ernest Mcalester | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $51,758 |
72 | Arvil R Nelson | Talihina, OK 74571 | $51,347 |
73 | Russell Dale Shaw | Tuskahoma, OK 74574 | $51,321 |
74 | Benny Franklin Coffey | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $50,560 |
75 | Bob Butzer | Indianola, OK 74442 | $49,524 |
76 | Charles A Enis | Stigler, OK 74462 | $48,755 |
77 | David William Shaw | Talihina, OK 74571 | $48,751 |
78 | Rana Inc | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $46,965 |
79 | Travis Hood | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $46,592 |
80 | Jimmy R Alford | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $46,336 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”