Farm Subsidy information
Latimer County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Latimer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 755
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Latimer County, Oklahoma totaled $16,509,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Charles R Warren | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $19,397 |
142 | Otho Enis | Vinita, OK 74301 | $19,230 |
143 | Rosita Branscum | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $19,229 |
144 | Sylmand E Welch | Tuskahoma, OK 74574 | $19,123 |
145 | Linda Alford | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $18,949 |
146 | Russell M Brownlee | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $18,919 |
147 | Buffalo Mountain Cattle Company L | Talihina, OK 74571 | $18,878 |
148 | Lesley King | Talihina, OK 74571 | $18,720 |
149 | Victor Eugene Doyle | Talihina, OK 74571 | $18,553 |
150 | Eric Knight | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $18,517 |
151 | Billy R Price | Talihina, OK 74571 | $18,279 |
152 | Albert Cannady | Tuskahoma, OK 74574 | $18,194 |
153 | Don King | Clayton, OK 74536 | $18,058 |
154 | Robert Wayne Ketcher | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $17,866 |
155 | Jeffrey Donoley | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $17,369 |
156 | Bradley Grogan | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $17,248 |
157 | Bueford R Lockhart | Tuskahoma, OK 74574 | $17,002 |
158 | Jason Shirrell Brown | Tuskahoma, OK 74574 | $16,907 |
159 | Natalie B Lawson | Talihina, OK 74571 | $16,865 |
160 | Brandon Doyle Owens | Wister, OK 74966 | $16,712 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”