Farm Subsidy information
Latimer County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Latimer County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 224
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Latimer County, Oklahoma totaled $878,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $108,352 |
| 2 | Gerald Knapp | Talihina, OK 74571 | $49,373 |
| 3 | Jeffrey Cattle Company | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $35,906 |
| 4 | Jim And Linda Enis Farm, LLC | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $33,428 |
| 5 | Michael Guazdausky | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $31,687 |
| 6 | Eric Holbird | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $26,805 |
| 7 | Watts Ranch LLC | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $26,325 |
| 8 | Gerald Shero | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $24,313 |
| 9 | James H Booth Jr | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $22,068 |
| 10 | Travis Hood | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $18,132 |
| 11 | John Jeffrey | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $17,239 |
| 12 | Cody Browne | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $16,961 |
| 13 | Tim Grogan | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $16,198 |
| 14 | Seven Lakes Ranch | Talihina, OK 74571 | $15,396 |
| 15 | Ronald D Garner | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $14,325 |
| 16 | Charles Wesley Fitzgerald | Talihina, OK 74571 | $10,475 |
| 17 | Fred F James Jr | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $9,108 |
| 18 | Delbert Derryberry | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $8,936 |
| 19 | Troy L Walker II | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $8,591 |
| 20 | Raspotnik Ranch LLC | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $8,071 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf