Farm Subsidy information
Love County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Love County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,113
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Love County, Oklahoma totaled $48,329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kevin Dale Grant | Ringling, OK 73456 | $161,485 |
82 | Steve A Tucker | Overbrook, OK 73453 | $158,995 |
83 | Glenda Hicks | Plano, TX 75093 | $158,795 |
84 | Kelly Don Geurin | Saint Jo, TX 76265 | $151,569 |
85 | Roger R Hilton | Marietta, OK 73448 | $148,552 |
86 | Scott Brothers Partnership | Ardmore, OK 73401 | $147,887 |
87 | Drennan Trust | Marietta, OK 73448 | $147,591 |
88 | Ott Ladner | Burneyville, OK 73430 | $142,363 |
89 | Gary Don Geurin | Saint Jo, TX 76265 | $134,671 |
90 | Jacmark Investments Ltd | Overbrook, OK 73453 | $132,230 |
91 | Neva Joyce Harrill | Marietta, OK 73448 | $129,218 |
92 | Thomas Gerald Hicks | Burneyville, OK 73430 | $128,351 |
93 | Eugene Bond | Marietta, OK 73448 | $124,810 |
94 | Charles W Hallum | Burneyville, OK 73430 | $124,252 |
95 | Bobby Pillow | Burneyville, OK 73430 | $117,687 |
96 | Tim Rains | Marietta, OK 73448 | $117,056 |
97 | J W Rains | Thackerville, OK 73459 | $113,579 |
98 | John Wesley Hart | Marietta, OK 73448 | $113,513 |
99 | Q Livestock LLC | Marietta, OK 73448 | $110,828 |
100 | Clyde Milton Folsom | Marietta, OK 73448 | $110,593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”