Deficiency Payment in McIntosh County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 66
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in McIntosh County, Oklahoma totaled $49,578 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Raymond E Carey | Checotah, OK 74426 | $808 |
22 | William Z Duncan | Oklahoma City, OK 73162 | $773 |
23 | Manyrd Clay | Checotah, OK 74426 | $719 |
24 | Willie Mae Etheridge | Oklahoma City, OK 73141 | $679 |
25 | John C Carey | Golden, CO 80403 | $670 |
26 | Mitchell Porter Carey | Checotah, OK 74426 | $670 |
27 | Bernice Archer Estate | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $668 |
28 | Albert C Hutton Jr | Tulsa, OK 74106 | $651 |
29 | Jane Martin | Checotah, OK 74426 | $631 |
30 | Nancy Martin | Eufaula, OK 74432 | $631 |
31 | Ralph D Davidson | Checotah, OK 74426 | $622 |
32 | Willard Combs | Checotah, OK 74426 | $608 |
33 | Vaughn M Miller | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $592 |
34 | Maurice Martin | Checotah, OK 74426 | $581 |
35 | Connie Herndon | Checotah, OK 74426 | $546 |
36 | Ronnie Lee Layman | Eufaula, OK 74432 | $443 |
37 | Mahone Pullen Partnership | Oklahoma City, OK 73112 | $430 |
38 | W W Sparks | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $425 |
39 | Homer H Stewart | Checotah, OK 74426 | $384 |
40 | Doyle Mitchell | Checotah, OK 74426 | $370 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”