Production Flexibility Program in McIntosh County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 234
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in McIntosh County, Oklahoma totaled $684,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jessy R Highfill | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $62,954 |
2 | Roddy L Rose | Checotah, OK 74426 | $32,746 |
3 | Bane Whisenhunt | Checotah, OK 74426 | $25,789 |
4 | Ronnie Lee Layman | Eufaula, OK 74432 | $24,831 |
5 | Michael W Voss | Checotah, OK 74426 | $20,576 |
6 | Kevin B Bogard | Hanna, OK 74845 | $19,971 |
7 | R J Walters Trust | Checotah, OK 74426 | $17,415 |
8 | Alfred Leroy Lane Jr | Eufaula, OK 74432 | $17,399 |
9 | Dana Watson | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $14,626 |
10 | Vester Layman | Hanna, OK 74845 | $14,207 |
11 | Willard Combs | Checotah, OK 74426 | $12,416 |
12 | Charley Shropshire | Hanna, OK 74845 | $12,157 |
13 | Gary Watson | Tulsa, OK 74137 | $11,790 |
14 | Jane Martin | Checotah, OK 74426 | $10,787 |
15 | Vaughn M Miller | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $10,744 |
16 | Ronald Ray Martin | Checotah, OK 74426 | $9,759 |
17 | Claude W Voigt | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $9,283 |
18 | James Elmenhorst | Oktaha, OK 74450 | $9,061 |
19 | Lankston L Harris | Checotah, OK 74426 | $8,539 |
20 | Edward Kloeckler | Checotah, OK 74426 | $8,222 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>