Total Commodity Programs in Major County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,885
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Major County, Oklahoma totaled $110,888,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard L Haggard | Lahoma, OK 73754 | $567,852 |
22 | John Lee Wright | Enid, OK 73703 | $566,187 |
23 | Kevin Lee Smith | Fairview, OK 73737 | $563,082 |
24 | Darren Charles Wichert | Fairview, OK 73737 | $558,133 |
25 | Arlie Wichert | Fairview, OK 73737 | $547,410 |
26 | Bank Of Kremlin | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $539,366 |
27 | Deep Creek Cattle LLC | Isabella, OK 73747 | $531,405 |
28 | Howard- Dba Howard R Reimer | Ringwood, OK 73768 | $531,031 |
29 | Claudia's Farm, Inc | Enid, OK 73703 | $525,868 |
30 | Gene Cottom | Meno, OK 73760 | $523,549 |
31 | Matthew Seelke | Okeene, OK 73763 | $514,401 |
32 | Flying G Ranch | Fairview, OK 73737 | $512,266 |
33 | Jerry Nickelson | Waynoka, OK 73860 | $491,238 |
34 | Erland W Martens | Fairview, OK 73737 | $485,125 |
35 | Dean Reimer- Dba Dean Cameron Reimer Rev Trust | Ringwood, OK 73768 | $481,626 |
36 | Greg Wichert | Fairview, OK 73737 | $474,135 |
37 | Trent Dba Trent Mart Martens | Fairview, OK 73737 | $473,748 |
38 | Farm Credit Of Enid ** | Enid, OK 73703 | $471,728 |
39 | Larry J Wright | Isabella, OK 73747 | $455,977 |
40 | Byron Jantz | Meno, OK 73760 | $454,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”