Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 685
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, Oklahoma totaled $23,146,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronald Dean Hartin | Madill, OK 73446 | $102,734 |
42 | Pepper Ray Melton | Lebanon, OK 73440 | $99,055 |
43 | Vent Lollis | Kingston, OK 73439 | $99,009 |
44 | Tony Hawkins | Madill, OK 73446 | $97,416 |
45 | Dowe M Justice | Kingston, OK 73439 | $96,817 |
46 | , | $93,608 | |
47 | Dallas W Scribner Jr | Kingston, OK 73439 | $87,813 |
48 | Watkins Ranch Land And Cattle LLC | Madill, OK 73446 | $85,157 |
49 | Michael Quincy Oliver | Madill, OK 73446 | $81,682 |
50 | Douglas Stowers | Madill, OK 73446 | $81,270 |
51 | George Allen French | Madill, OK 73446 | $80,954 |
52 | Walter Bruce Bigger | Madill, OK 73446 | $78,622 |
53 | Glen Burns | Madill, OK 73446 | $77,044 |
54 | Basil W Savage Sr | Madill, OK 73446 | $73,034 |
55 | Carl D Barnes | Madill, OK 73446 | $72,625 |
56 | Tommy Steve Buckaloo | Kingston, OK 73439 | $72,503 |
57 | Elisha Gene Mcgahey | Kingston, OK 73439 | $71,731 |
58 | Kent Donica | Ardmore, OK 73401 | $70,498 |
59 | Ora F Gray | Madill, OK 73446 | $69,848 |
60 | James Bridgeman | Kingston, OK 73439 | $69,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”