Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Osage County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Osage County, Oklahoma totaled $475,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gregory A Goad | Ralston, OK 74650 | $3,815 |
42 | Keeler Enterprises Inc | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $3,608 |
43 | Terry S Laymon-barnett | Sperry, OK 74073 | $3,602 |
44 | Roger H Lloyd | Barnsdall, OK 74002 | $3,588 |
45 | Rosemary Wood | Pawhuska, OK 74056 | $3,432 |
46 | King Bowman | Fairfax, OK 74637 | $3,388 |
47 | Helen Nadine Elsberry | Fairfax, OK 74637 | $3,358 |
48 | John T Manning | Pawhuska, OK 74056 | $3,266 |
49 | Peggy Pharaoh Williams | Burke, VA 22015 | $3,260 |
50 | Charles Batschelett | Fairfax, OK 74637 | $3,226 |
51 | Raymond A Whitmire | Marietta, OK 73448 | $3,136 |
52 | Ferry V Bennett | Barnsdall, OK 74002 | $3,110 |
53 | Robert D Gray | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $3,049 |
54 | Harry Williams | Tulsa, OK 74145 | $2,966 |
55 | James Gary Taylor | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $2,961 |
56 | Gary Higgins | Ralston, OK 74650 | $2,670 |
57 | Robert And Linda Hart Revoc Trust | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $2,530 |
58 | Cecil E Cales Jr | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $2,482 |
59 | Robert L Cales | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $2,410 |
60 | Dan Barlow | Fairfax, OK 74637 | $2,269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”