Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 930
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma totaled $22,830,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farrell Cunningham | Stuart, OK 74570 | $629,997 |
2 | Eddie Harper | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $402,800 |
3 | Cecil Cable | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $401,109 |
4 | Crail Denton Mcnutt | Stuart, OK 74570 | $360,268 |
5 | Roy Hatridge | Wardville, OK 74576 | $357,018 |
6 | Kelly Gleese | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $252,252 |
7 | Edward Randell Ward | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $244,569 |
8 | Sterling Ranches | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $235,750 |
9 | Freddie Browne | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $234,759 |
10 | Big V Ranch Inc | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $232,188 |
11 | Leon Cable | Quinton, OK 74561 | $229,555 |
12 | Thomas Irwin | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $229,545 |
13 | Charles Tracy Shelton | Quinton, OK 74561 | $201,229 |
14 | Dash Ranch LLC | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $186,148 |
15 | Kevin Royce Smith | Blanco, OK 74528 | $183,422 |
16 | Lehnhard/johnston | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $172,456 |
17 | Wagnon Ranch Limited Partnership | Quinton, OK 74561 | $166,248 |
18 | Tracy Adam | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $164,717 |
19 | Kent Dalmont | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $164,425 |
20 | Arnold Hamilton | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $156,855 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>