Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 650
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma totaled $2,009,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joe Breeden | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $16,137 |
22 | Russell Uselton | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $15,480 |
23 | Charles E Holt III | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $14,677 |
24 | David Wright | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $14,648 |
25 | William Verner | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $14,601 |
26 | Caddo Creek Cattle Co LLC | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $14,498 |
27 | Kevin Woody | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $14,464 |
28 | , | $14,404 | |
29 | Sharon Chesnut | Pittsburg, OK 74560 | $14,363 |
30 | Jeffie Ann Ely | Stuart, OK 74570 | $14,152 |
31 | Kent Dalmont | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $13,958 |
32 | , | $13,618 | |
33 | Mark Alan Newman | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $13,455 |
34 | , | $13,298 | |
35 | Thomas Irwin | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $13,190 |
36 | David J Scott | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $12,613 |
37 | Leon Cable | Quinton, OK 74561 | $12,488 |
38 | William Garett Rose | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $12,440 |
39 | Orvil Lee 'rod' Griffith Jr | Indianola, OK 74442 | $12,110 |
40 | Kevin Royce Smith | Blanco, OK 74528 | $12,004 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”