Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 602
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma totaled $1,741,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bart Patterson | Stuart, OK 74570 | $7,866 |
42 | Russell Uselton | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $7,694 |
43 | Bonnie Ward | Indianola, OK 74442 | $7,676 |
44 | Michael Guazdausky | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $7,460 |
45 | Jlm Cattle Company LLC | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $7,458 |
46 | Weeks Brothers Cattle Company LLC | Stuart, OK 74570 | $7,178 |
47 | Norton Cattle Co, LLC | Pompano Beach, FL 33062 | $7,050 |
48 | Charles E Holt III | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $6,826 |
49 | Kenny Ragan | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $6,441 |
50 | Terry Johnson | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $6,279 |
51 | Jason Spruell | Clayton, OK 74536 | $6,262 |
52 | Jeffie Ann Ely | Stuart, OK 74570 | $6,156 |
53 | Kenneth W Sherrill | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $6,007 |
54 | James Buckner | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $5,986 |
55 | Sheena Diane Mathis | Indianola, OK 74442 | $5,969 |
56 | Arnold Hamilton | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $5,813 |
57 | James A Shropshire | Indianola, OK 74442 | $5,765 |
58 | James G Grego | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $5,751 |
59 | Michael Brian Clifton | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $5,624 |
60 | Larry B Winters | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $5,520 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”