Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 639
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma totaled $3,675,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ted L Cable | Savanna, OK 74565 | $15,895 |
42 | Tom Creager | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $15,840 |
43 | Janice G Hensley | Kinta, OK 74552 | $15,370 |
44 | James R Russell | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $15,290 |
45 | Bonnie Ward | Indianola, OK 74442 | $15,180 |
46 | Weeks Brothers Cattle Company LLC | Stuart, OK 74570 | $14,355 |
47 | Ronnie Allford | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $14,080 |
48 | Arnold Hamilton | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $14,042 |
49 | Charles C Faber | Indianola, OK 74442 | $13,860 |
50 | Millard Sweetin | Blanco, OK 74528 | $13,640 |
51 | Ronald Richardson | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $13,310 |
52 | Norton Cattle Co, LLC | Pompano Beach, FL 33062 | $12,980 |
53 | Sheena Diane Mathis | Indianola, OK 74442 | $12,760 |
54 | Jim Ward | Pittsburg, OK 74560 | $12,705 |
55 | A J Bristow | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $12,524 |
56 | Ryan Wayne Ketchum | Indianola, OK 74442 | $12,430 |
57 | Larry B Winters | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $12,397 |
58 | Jlm Cattle Company LLC | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $12,375 |
59 | Charles E Holt III | Mcalester, OK 74502 | $12,375 |
60 | Dustin Cody Tidwell | Eufaula, OK 74432 | $12,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”