Farm Subsidy information
Pittsburg County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 717
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma totaled $10,052,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Orvil Lee 'rod' Griffith Jr | Indianola, OK 74442 | $22,430 |
122 | Terry Lee Thornton | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $22,204 |
123 | Ronnie Ragan | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $22,080 |
124 | Henry L Traut | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $22,017 |
125 | Hulon Edwards | Indianola, OK 74442 | $21,941 |
126 | Larry Turney | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $21,856 |
127 | James Bryan Echelle | Indianola, OK 74442 | $21,711 |
128 | Michael West | Quinton, OK 74561 | $21,695 |
129 | Rodney P Ragan | Indianola, OK 74442 | $21,503 |
130 | Justin R Buckner | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $21,503 |
131 | Dustin Shane Ragan | Indianola, OK 74442 | $21,208 |
132 | Eric West | Stuart, OK 74570 | $21,083 |
133 | Arthur Lee Green | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $20,672 |
134 | Jimmy Taylor | Quinton, OK 74561 | $20,425 |
135 | Mark Stephen Thomas | Indianola, OK 74442 | $20,323 |
136 | , | $20,307 | |
137 | Kellie Margaret Thomas | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $20,040 |
138 | Thomas Jackson Reasnor | Kinta, OK 74552 | $19,783 |
139 | William Andrew Barnard | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $19,727 |
140 | Sharon Chesnut | Pittsburg, OK 74560 | $19,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”