Total Commodity Programs in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 946
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma totaled $15,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jim Schumacher | Indianola, OK 74442 | $21,009 |
162 | Wallace Wilson | Pittsburg, OK 74560 | $20,911 |
163 | Clyde Spears | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $20,540 |
164 | Elizabeth Jones Angeli | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $20,420 |
165 | Mark Stephen Thomas | Indianola, OK 74442 | $20,298 |
166 | Gregory Dee Spahn Irrevocable Trust | Broken Arrow, OK 74011 | $20,214 |
167 | William T Pearson | Atoka, OK 74525 | $20,203 |
168 | Foy Justin Duke | Checotah, OK 74426 | $20,189 |
169 | Paul Hamilton | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $20,106 |
170 | Maxine E Oliver | Quinton, OK 74561 | $20,053 |
171 | Jeffie Ann Ely | Stuart, OK 74570 | $19,967 |
172 | Phillip W Randazzo | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $19,844 |
173 | Henry L Traut | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $19,758 |
174 | Christopher T Hackler | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $19,655 |
175 | Dustin Cody Shields | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $19,472 |
176 | William Larry Allen | Indianola, OK 74442 | $19,231 |
177 | Harold Hackler Jr | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $19,204 |
178 | Pete Manschreck | Krebs, OK 74554 | $19,193 |
179 | James White Jr | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $19,010 |
180 | William D Drake | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $18,992 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”