Farm Subsidy information
Roger Mills County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 575
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma totaled $7,460,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dan Sprowls Living Trust Dated September 13,1995 | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $27,569 |
62 | Duane Harrel | Leedey, OK 73654 | $27,553 |
63 | Ray Hughes | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $27,474 |
64 | Randy Malson | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $27,422 |
65 | James W Chalfant Jr | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $26,669 |
66 | Judy Bentley | Leedey, OK 73654 | $25,417 |
67 | Brian L Leddy | Leedey, OK 73654 | $25,092 |
68 | Burckhalter Dairy Inc | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $24,965 |
69 | Carolyn Gwartney | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $24,553 |
70 | Jimmy E Snell | Reydon, OK 73660 | $24,117 |
71 | Sandra Dean | Hammon, OK 73650 | $23,958 |
72 | William D Farrell | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $23,899 |
73 | Jim Barber | Crawford, OK 73638 | $23,805 |
74 | Laubach Land & Cattle Co | Okeene, OK 73763 | $23,496 |
75 | Kendall-kendall & Sue Bayless Rev. Trust Bayless | Arnett, OK 73832 | $23,338 |
76 | Tucker Family Trust | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $23,090 |
77 | Billy A Broadbent Revocable Trust | Leedey, OK 73654 | $22,978 |
78 | Jerry D Jones | Piedmont, OK 73078 | $22,910 |
79 | Leslie Lance Kendall | Elk City, OK 73644 | $22,824 |
80 | Jeremy K York | Durham, OK 73642 | $22,189 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”