Farm Subsidy information
Sequoyah County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,204
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma totaled $36,083,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jimmy Harrell Lee | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $116,874 |
42 | Allen F Hales | Fort Smith, AR 72903 | $110,845 |
43 | Bryant Reeves | Gans, OK 74936 | $108,572 |
44 | Larry Blount | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $107,842 |
45 | Lynn Hubler | Gore, OK 74435 | $105,744 |
46 | Cosner Farms Inc | Roland, OK 74954 | $102,349 |
47 | Jesse B Fargo Jr | Gans, OK 74936 | $101,023 |
48 | Pierce Family Partnership LLC | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $100,146 |
49 | Patrick Sullivan | Vian, OK 74962 | $95,764 |
50 | Jeffrey R Brant | Muldrow, OK 74948 | $93,649 |
51 | Don B Bedford | Muldrow, OK 74948 | $89,782 |
52 | The Marjorie Echo Garvin Rider Trust | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $88,860 |
53 | Buster Drain | Marble City, OK 74945 | $87,168 |
54 | Melvin Stites | Vian, OK 74962 | $86,460 |
55 | Kenneth W Brannon | Gans, OK 74936 | $85,329 |
56 | Thomas William Justice | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $84,801 |
57 | David L Cox | Marble City, OK 74945 | $84,210 |
58 | Jerry Ben Robertson | Vian, OK 74962 | $83,818 |
59 | Jamie W Croley | Stilwell, OK 74960 | $82,311 |
60 | Richard Darren Stites | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $81,804 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”