Farm Subsidy information
Stephens County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Stephens County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,995
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stephens County, Oklahoma totaled $96,777,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kevin Graham | Marlow, OK 73055 | $2,896,833 |
2 | William Eugene Nunley | Marlow, OK 73055 | $2,882,495 |
3 | Files Farm LLC | Duncan, OK 73533 | $1,763,890 |
4 | Lee W Stepp | Comanche, OK 73529 | $1,453,180 |
5 | Vernon Dunn Jr | Loco, OK 73442 | $1,328,978 |
6 | Lyndel D Strain | Duncan, OK 73533 | $1,321,238 |
7 | Mark Ely | Velma, OK 73491 | $1,311,282 |
8 | Michael D Kelly | Marlow, OK 73055 | $1,284,927 |
9 | D Johnson Ranches Inc | Duncan, OK 73533 | $1,197,257 |
10 | Alvin Tatum | Marlow, OK 73055 | $1,141,050 |
11 | Reeder Farms Inc | Marlow, OK 73055 | $1,102,344 |
12 | Shannon O Hall | Comanche, OK 73529 | $1,100,803 |
13 | Jimmie Bethany | Duncan, OK 73533 | $1,097,225 |
14 | Dennis D Sweat | Marlow, OK 73055 | $1,029,977 |
15 | Mr Harold Turner Biffle Jr | Velma, OK 73491 | $973,845 |
16 | Mike Graham | Marlow, OK 73055 | $917,135 |
17 | Pogue Brothers Cattle Co LLC | Duncan, OK 73533 | $916,065 |
18 | Bernhardt Land & Cattle Company LLC | Marlow, OK 73055 | $914,779 |
19 | Donald B Prater | Marlow, OK 73055 | $911,077 |
20 | Phil Fleetwood | Marlow, OK 73055 | $850,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>