Production Flexibility Program in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 246
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Tulsa County, Oklahoma totaled $1,256,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Luther Teel | Collinsville, OK 74021 | $4,799 |
62 | John C Easton Rev Living Trust | Bixby, OK 74008 | $4,798 |
63 | Easton Sod Farms Inc | Bixby, OK 74008 | $4,626 |
64 | Donald Roe & Helen F Henderson Re | Bixby, OK 74008 | $4,532 |
65 | Donald Adrian Brown | Mounds, OK 74047 | $4,438 |
66 | L C Neel | Broken Arrow, OK 74011 | $4,269 |
67 | Werner Knigge | Collinsville, OK 74021 | $4,184 |
68 | Chester Don Carmichael | Bixby, OK 74008 | $4,036 |
69 | Progressive Land & Cattle Co | Bartlesville, OK 74006 | $3,796 |
70 | Paulet Garrett | Broken Arrow, OK 74013 | $3,740 |
71 | Danny Welch | Inola, OK 74036 | $3,647 |
72 | William G Boone | Sand Springs, OK 74063 | $3,646 |
73 | Clifford G And Lorene A Vohon Tru | Broken Arrow, OK 74011 | $3,623 |
74 | Carwin Edward Henderson Trust | Fort Gibson, OK 74434 | $3,587 |
75 | Charles A Kothe | Tulsa, OK 74105 | $3,559 |
76 | E M & Dorothy F Worstell Co Trust | Collinsville, OK 74021 | $3,539 |
77 | Dennis L Cole | Broken Arrow, OK 74011 | $3,524 |
78 | Mark A Cottom | Mounds, OK 74047 | $3,283 |
79 | Robert E Norman | Tulsa, OK 74105 | $3,253 |
80 | Bob Hansen | Broken Arrow, OK 74012 | $3,235 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”