Farm Subsidy information
Washita County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Washita County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 4,465
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washita County, Oklahoma totaled $432,003,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | George Donald Gray Rev Liv Tr | Burns Flat, OK 73624 | $920,683 |
82 | John P Adams | Burns Flat, OK 73624 | $913,113 |
83 | Jimmie Dale Davis | Foss, OK 73647 | $906,771 |
84 | Raymond N Pritchard | Mountain View, OK 73062 | $902,720 |
85 | Gerald D Nickel Rev Trust | Bessie, OK 73622 | $891,289 |
86 | Darrell Wayne Hileman | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $888,694 |
87 | Louis A Spitz | Canute, OK 73626 | $888,043 |
88 | Larry Nightengale | Cordell, OK 73632 | $882,433 |
89 | Shawn Paul Adams | Burns Flat, OK 73624 | $880,592 |
90 | Jerry T Willard | Cordell, OK 73632 | $879,693 |
91 | Chris Schneberger | Foss, OK 73647 | $878,504 |
92 | Gossen Farms Inc | Cordell, OK 73632 | $865,523 |
93 | Donnie - Donnie L Bo L Boggs | Cordell, OK 73632 | $859,279 |
94 | Edward G Diffendaffer | Rocky, OK 73661 | $856,052 |
95 | Donald Raydell Schneberger | Dill City, OK 73641 | $855,808 |
96 | Rannie Gale Luper | Mountain View, OK 73062 | $850,020 |
97 | Randall Ridling | Sentinel, OK 73664 | $849,155 |
98 | Monte Nickel | Bessie, OK 73622 | $846,013 |
99 | Jimmy Linn | Dill City, OK 73641 | $841,652 |
100 | Dee Ann Evetts Rev Tr | Sentinel, OK 73664 | $840,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”