Farm Subsidy information
Woods County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Woods County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 589
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Woods County, Oklahoma totaled $20,747,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Travis George | Waynoka, OK 73860 | $60,278 |
82 | Heaton Land & Cattle Co LLC | Alva, OK 73717 | $58,913 |
83 | Chad Budy | Alva, OK 73717 | $56,933 |
84 | Leon Erikson- The Erikson Rev. Family Trust | Alva, OK 73717 | $56,274 |
85 | Chase Anthony Isenbart | Alva, OK 73717 | $56,105 |
86 | Fred A Isenbart | Alva, OK 73717 | $54,691 |
87 | Holly N Blevins | Alva, OK 73717 | $54,378 |
88 | Wessels Rev Trust G Dwight & Kathie R | Cherokee, OK 73728 | $53,756 |
89 | Allan Dale Poe | Cherokee, OK 73728 | $52,788 |
90 | Louis H. Schupbach Irrv. Tr. 1 | Alva, OK 73717 | $52,680 |
91 | Kellie Thiesing | Alva, OK 73717 | $51,779 |
92 | Kelli Marie Lancaster | Dacoma, OK 73731 | $51,657 |
93 | Terry Budy | Alva, OK 73717 | $51,644 |
94 | Denis Carlson | Freedom, OK 73842 | $51,624 |
95 | Gt Cattle Company, Inc | Burlington, OK 73722 | $50,874 |
96 | Jay M Leeper | Alva, OK 73717 | $50,211 |
97 | Trevor Allen Baird | Waynoka, OK 73860 | $50,040 |
98 | Daniel D Mundorf | Alva, OK 73717 | $48,942 |
99 | Cody Hodgden | Woodward, OK 73802 | $48,838 |
100 | Danielle Faye Budy | Alva, OK 73717 | $48,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”