Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Oregon, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,804
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Oregon totaled $24,367,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Coffman Farms LLC | Independence, OR 97351 | $48,864 |
82 | Sheree Owens | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $48,710 |
83 | Johnson, Mark Dba Nature's Best - Oregon Honey LLC | Portland, OR 97231 | $48,568 |
84 | Ketscher Cattle Co | Hines, OR 97738 | $48,334 |
85 | Monty C Siddoway | Vale, OR 97918 | $48,312 |
86 | Joseph B Mckay | Juntura, OR 97911 | $47,716 |
87 | William P Conley | Prineville, OR 97754 | $47,406 |
88 | Rose's Livestock Company LLC | Christmas Valley, OR 97641 | $47,290 |
89 | Bert R Siddoway | Durkee, OR 97905 | $46,729 |
90 | Tom J. Davis Livestock Inc | Princeton, OR 97721 | $46,593 |
91 | Joyce Mckay | Juntura, OR 97911 | $46,297 |
92 | Soldier Creek Ranch, Limited Partnership | Jordan Valley, OR 97910 | $46,226 |
93 | William J Butler II | Juntura, OR 97911 | $46,091 |
94 | , | $45,502 | |
95 | Flynn & Company LLC | Lakeview, OR 97630 | $45,341 |
96 | Mark Mackenzie LLC | Jordan Valley, OR 97910 | $45,241 |
97 | Maxwell Cattle Inc | Lakeview, OR 97630 | $45,224 |
98 | Aaron J Borror | Fort Rock, OR 97735 | $45,123 |
99 | M & A Livestock | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $44,680 |
100 | Ten Mile Ranch Inc | Vale, OR 97918 | $44,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”