Total Conservation Programs in Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,212
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Oregon totaled $28,979,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Leonard Buddy Wells Jr | Sun City, AZ 85351 | $49,905 |
102 | Sharon Martin | Seattle, WA 98102 | $49,886 |
103 | Dum-ee Corporation | Port Orford, OR 97465 | $49,834 |
104 | James D Hatley | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $49,825 |
105 | Evelyn E Hatley | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $49,824 |
106 | Steven A Prock & Kittie M Prock Fam Trust | Eagle Creek, OR 97022 | $49,800 |
107 | Mathew T Bridges | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $49,663 |
108 | Mike T Bridges | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $49,661 |
109 | Nathan D Bridges | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $49,661 |
110 | Rabo Agrifinance LLC ** | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $49,606 |
111 | Kathy C Nelson | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $49,535 |
112 | Bedortha Ranches Inc | Paulina, OR 97751 | $49,459 |
113 | Bafus & Keller LLC | Colfax, WA 99111 | $49,196 |
114 | Michael L Bowman | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $49,104 |
115 | Tjl Ranch LLC | Issaquah, WA 98027 | $49,015 |
116 | Vera A Clarke Revocable Living Trust - Vera Clarke | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $49,014 |
117 | Douglas E Wilson | Condon, OR 97823 | $48,953 |
118 | Jean Wilson | Condon, OR 97823 | $48,953 |
119 | Betsy Pattee | Condon, OR 97823 | $48,867 |
120 | Starvation Farms | Lexington, OR 97839 | $48,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”