Total Conservation Programs in Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,212
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Oregon totaled $28,979,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Justesen Ranches | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $45,805 |
142 | Paul Schanno | Dufur, OR 97021 | $45,759 |
143 | L & C Kent Property LLC | Grand Junction, CO 81506 | $45,694 |
144 | Gary Bloomer | Baker City, OR 97814 | $45,663 |
145 | Edwards Sisters LLC | Condon, OR 97823 | $45,454 |
146 | Tom Rietmann | Condon, OR 97823 | $45,221 |
147 | Katherine E Filbin | Dufur, OR 97021 | $45,203 |
148 | Michael S Filbin | Dufur, OR 97021 | $45,203 |
149 | Don Mcelligott Sons | Ione, OR 97843 | $44,700 |
150 | Douglas J Bibby | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $44,547 |
151 | Thomas A Duyck | Forest Grove, OR 97116 | $44,371 |
152 | Thompson Land | Heppner, OR 97836 | $44,323 |
153 | James W Cutsforth | Kennewick, WA 99338 | $44,197 |
154 | Potter & Son's Farms | Condon, OR 97823 | $43,998 |
155 | Rolling Ranch LLC | Keizer, OR 97303 | $43,980 |
156 | Horseshoe Hereford Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $43,943 |
157 | Larry Palmer | Heppner, OR 97836 | $43,795 |
158 | Keven Haguewood | Ione, OR 97843 | $43,520 |
159 | Elton Cook | Baker City, OR 97814 | $43,412 |
160 | T & K Ranching | Heppner, OR 97836 | $43,338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”