Farm Subsidy information
Oregon
Total Subsidies in Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 9,052
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oregon totaled $275,073,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Otis Creek Ranch, LLC | Drewsey, OR 97904 | $264,175 |
62 | I Z Ranch, LLC | Canyon City, OR 97820 | $258,376 |
63 | Boyle Family Farms LLC | Madras, OR 97741 | $258,217 |
64 | Reerslev Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $257,266 |
65 | H M Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $255,443 |
66 | Homer Ranch | Fossil, OR 97830 | $255,195 |
67 | Jenkins Ranches Inc | Diamond, OR 97722 | $254,618 |
68 | Roselawn Seed Co Inc | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $254,139 |
69 | Rainbow Hill Ranch Inc | Monmouth, OR 97361 | $253,703 |
70 | Joseph P Ficher | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $252,913 |
71 | Warnock Ranches Inc | Maupin, OR 97037 | $252,748 |
72 | Mike Peila | Hines, OR 97738 | $251,096 |
73 | B L Davis Ranch Inc | Adams, OR 97810 | $250,725 |
74 | Yoshitomi Brothers Inc | West Linn, OR 97068 | $250,500 |
75 | Peoria Gardens, Inc | Albany, OR 97321 | $250,500 |
76 | Delta Farms Abn Pumpkin Patch Inc | Portland, OR 97231 | $250,148 |
77 | Cherry Blossom Orchard LLC | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $250,000 |
78 | Little Prince Of Oregon Nursery Inc | Aurora, OR 97002 | $250,000 |
79 | Kirk Company | Beavercreek, OR 97004 | $250,000 |
80 | Heirloom Roses Inc | Saint Paul, OR 97137 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”