Total Commodity Programs in Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 25,666
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Oregon totaled $1,485,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sidney J And Darla K Seale | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,762,328 |
42 | Agrigrow | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $1,749,436 |
43 | Fir Ridge Holstein Farm LLC | Scio, OR 97374 | $1,739,960 |
44 | Grieb Land Co | Lexington, OR 97839 | $1,683,468 |
45 | Mills Mint Farm Inc | Stanfield, OR 97875 | $1,681,387 |
46 | Bates Ranches | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,676,757 |
47 | Golden Valley East LLC | Stanfield, OR 97875 | $1,672,416 |
48 | Snow Ranches | Echo, OR 97826 | $1,653,515 |
49 | Betts Ranch | Adams, OR 97810 | $1,641,369 |
50 | Jones & Jones Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $1,639,396 |
51 | Justesen Ranches | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $1,638,028 |
52 | Frederickson Farming LLC | Irrigon, OR 97844 | $1,632,553 |
53 | Forest Glen Oaks Inc | Dayton, OR 97114 | $1,627,497 |
54 | Lieuallen Farms | Adams, OR 97810 | $1,609,417 |
55 | Allen Farms Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $1,602,507 |
56 | Naumes Inc | Medford, OR 97501 | $1,589,724 |
57 | Jeff Cutsforth's Farm | Lexington, OR 97839 | $1,588,352 |
58 | Martin Underhill Farms Partnershi | Dufur, OR 97021 | $1,568,962 |
59 | B & B Ranches | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $1,563,288 |
60 | Beef Northwest Farm Partners | North Powder, OR 97867 | $1,538,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”