Production Flexibility Program in Baker County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 129
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $3,106,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brad Allen | North Powder, OR 97867 | $17,578 |
42 | Aaron Kasper | Scappoose, OR 97056 | $16,841 |
43 | William E Bailey | Baker City, OR 97814 | $16,673 |
44 | Douglas Newman | Haines, OR 97833 | $16,616 |
45 | Patrick Sullivan Dba Sullivan Land | Hereford, OR 97837 | $16,446 |
46 | Jeff Collier | Baker City, OR 97814 | $15,627 |
47 | Howard Payton | Baker City, OR 97814 | $15,350 |
48 | Allen Farms Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $15,331 |
49 | David Anderson | Haines, OR 97833 | $15,068 |
50 | C Tom & Lynne D Hill Trust | Baker City, OR 97814 | $14,204 |
51 | William Pierce | Baker City, OR 97814 | $13,562 |
52 | Mountain View Farms | Baker City, OR 97814 | $12,893 |
53 | Harrell Hereford Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $12,886 |
54 | Jensen Land And Livestock LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $12,324 |
55 | Williams Ditch Company | Baker City, OR 97814 | $12,177 |
56 | Donald L Wendt | Ontario, OR 97914 | $11,619 |
57 | Elsie Butler | Baker City, OR 97814 | $11,253 |
58 | Lois L Mcniece | Baker City, OR 97814 | $10,786 |
59 | K Steven Simpson | Terrebonne, OR 97760 | $9,619 |
60 | North Powder Ranches Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $9,615 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”