Total Conservation Programs in Baker County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 224
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $15,123,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Arm Ward Ranches | Baker City, OR 97814 | $53,182 |
62 | Flack Investments LLC | Eagle, ID 83616 | $47,696 |
63 | Jacobs Ranches, Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $47,446 |
64 | Bill A Williams | Richland, OR 97870 | $46,968 |
65 | Wm H Andrews | Baker City, OR 97814 | $46,496 |
66 | John Patterson | Heppner, OR 97836 | $46,496 |
67 | Walter W Jury | Baker City, OR 97814 | $45,993 |
68 | Donald Q Giles | Baker City, OR 97814 | $45,868 |
69 | Ross Fritz | North Powder, OR 97867 | $43,251 |
70 | Wayne Troy | Baker City, OR 97814 | $42,232 |
71 | Nathanial T Moore | Unity, OR 97884 | $41,843 |
72 | Philip And Denise Mcclanahan Family Trust Dated Ja | Baker City, OR 97814 | $38,350 |
73 | William T Moore | Unity, OR 97884 | $37,604 |
74 | Durbin Creek Ranch | Huntington, OR 97907 | $36,795 |
75 | Peyron Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $35,597 |
76 | Sutton Creek Cattle Company LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $35,379 |
77 | Dan Brassard | Baker City, OR 97814 | $34,487 |
78 | Holly Ogan | Baker City, OR 97814 | $32,807 |
79 | Loretta Cook | Baker City, OR 97814 | $32,186 |
80 | Edwin C White | Baker City, OR 97814 | $31,125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”