Total Commodity Programs in Clackamas County, Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 171
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clackamas County, Oregon totaled $5,853,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael Efimov Dba Marquam Hill Berries | Silverton, OR 97381 | $4,528 |
102 | Amy Martin, Dba Martin 5 Cattle | Beavercreek, OR 97004 | $4,266 |
103 | Philip Josse Dba Phils Farm | Damascus, OR 97089 | $4,240 |
104 | Oregrand Hazelnut Company | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $4,094 |
105 | Clair L Kuiper | Mount Angel, OR 97362 | $4,072 |
106 | Butte Creek Tree Farm LLC | Scotts Mills, OR 97375 | $4,063 |
107 | Shawn Zielinski | Canby, OR 97013 | $3,906 |
108 | Hopper Bros LLC | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $3,543 |
109 | Vernon S Simmons Testamentary Trust | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $3,469 |
110 | Fred I Reutov | Canby, OR 97013 | $3,467 |
111 | Campfire Farms LLC | Mulino, OR 97042 | $3,391 |
112 | James E Krieg | Molalla, OR 97038 | $3,345 |
113 | Leroy Thomas Peter | Canby, OR 97013 | $3,105 |
114 | Vikki L Ballou, Dba Ballou Family Farm | Sandy, OR 97055 | $2,984 |
115 | Luciole Vineyard LLC | Sherwood, OR 97140 | $2,968 |
116 | Stanley Cox | Oregon City, OR 97045 | $2,949 |
117 | Pavel Reutov | Molalla, OR 97038 | $2,607 |
118 | Vladislav Uzhva | Oregon City, OR 97045 | $2,544 |
119 | Joseph D Matteo | Beavercreek, OR 97004 | $2,525 |
120 | Wesley Moehnke | Beavercreek, OR 97004 | $2,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”