Farm Subsidy information
Clackamas County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Clackamas County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,030
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clackamas County, Oregon totaled $40,488,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dan Serres | Oregon City, OR 97045 | $155,857 |
42 | , | $153,543 | |
43 | Schriever Farms Inc | Molalla, OR 97038 | $152,546 |
44 | Scott Family Farms LLC | Canby, OR 97013 | $151,131 |
45 | David P Pyle | Lake Oswego, OR 97035 | $147,227 |
46 | Mountain Meadow Honey Inc | Colton, OR 97017 | $143,786 |
47 | Bronec Bros Inc | Hubbard, OR 97032 | $137,441 |
48 | Wil-view Farms Ltd Partnership | Wilsonville, OR 97070 | $137,154 |
49 | Horizon Farms LLC | Molalla, OR 97038 | $134,876 |
50 | East Valley Seed Co | Molalla, OR 97038 | $133,239 |
51 | , | $128,706 | |
52 | Robert L Purdy | Mount Angel, OR 97362 | $127,557 |
53 | Grassland Farms LLC | Canby, OR 97013 | $117,625 |
54 | Kraemer Farms LLC | Mount Angel, OR 97362 | $117,312 |
55 | Really Good Honey LLC | Oregon City, OR 97045 | $113,395 |
56 | Dan Schaefer | Molalla, OR 97038 | $111,229 |
57 | Countryside Acres LLC | Molalla, OR 97038 | $109,371 |
58 | David A Mcdonald | Canby, OR 97013 | $109,312 |
59 | Rodney David Liepold | Boring, OR 97009 | $106,599 |
60 | Anastas Sharabarin Dba M & A Farms | Molalla, OR 97038 | $106,375 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”