Farm Subsidy information
Coos County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Coos County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 684
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Coos County, Oregon totaled $20,541,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Shull | Silverton, OR 97381 | $164,570 |
22 | Mark H Isenhart | Broadbent, OR 97414 | $162,204 |
23 | Michael D Beam | Coquille, OR 97423 | $147,175 |
24 | Dale Blanton | Powers, OR 97466 | $146,077 |
25 | Fugate Farms LLC | Bandon, OR 97411 | $145,710 |
26 | Mast Farms Inc | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $141,675 |
27 | Douglas Sinko | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $141,412 |
28 | Hogan Family Partnership | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $131,432 |
29 | Coquille Indian Tribe | North Bend, OR 97459 | $125,974 |
30 | Csagge W Mcneely | Broadbent, OR 97414 | $119,726 |
31 | Savana LLC | Coquille, OR 97423 | $118,861 |
32 | Jerry Smith | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $116,869 |
33 | Moon River Ranch LLC | Lund, NV 89317 | $114,795 |
34 | William C Mast | Coquille, OR 97423 | $114,031 |
35 | Aaron B Mccall | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $111,270 |
36 | Ellis F Foster | Coquille, OR 97423 | $108,049 |
37 | Rock Creek Livestock LLC | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $106,358 |
38 | Johnson Dairy Inc | North Bend, OR 97459 | $105,916 |
39 | John Guynup | Langlois, OR 97450 | $105,346 |
40 | Jan M Geaney | Coquille, OR 97423 | $103,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”